Referendum That
"direct consultation of the people who will refer the matter directly in order of approval or rejection of a law."
I'm amazed at seeing what is greeted with silence by the media a certain act of this Government.
memory can begin to make me fail, not having an early age, but I seem to remember clearly that there were two places in the referendum and by the same Italian people voted in the last century. (We give a connotation of age to the facts, even if no more than 4-6 decades that have occurred, just not to feel too guilty to various journalists, commentators, that people fancazzisti ... bla bla media spaces).
I remember,
in a referendum on the use of nuclear power in Italy,
the majority of the Italian people were against .
I remember,
in a referendum on the use of GMOs in Italy,
majority of the Italian people were against .
seems to me that the results of the referendum to become law and which must be respected by all (I put it down simply because they are ignorant).
But, they are all dead those who have voted for it?
Here I understand that it will resume building nuclear power plants and to cultivate genetically modified corn and no one talks.
Laws, teaches us the nano, you can change (and his partners also seek to interpret its own use and consumption), but until this is done, remain valid.
When passed an amendment or repeal of Read above, popularly voted?
Or maybe it is not yet final and is a coup that is preparing to do, making changes in the middle of a hundred other sneaky with which they create a smokescreen?
But where are the media?
the divorce case of the nano? At this stage? At the big brother?
I speak to the media, because they do not even dare to invoke the most contradictory chamber.
El gh'รจ no!
Perhaps the technical knowledge evolve and the choices made then were based on ignorance of the people. Okay, please explain clearly and convince me why this, that seemed wrong then, right now.
If I explained it right, yes.
Otherwise no!
0 comments:
Post a Comment